Understanding the dual glass ceiling of selecting and electing women candidates: evidence from Latin American mayoral elections

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Women politicians face two distinct glass ceilings–when becoming candidates and when turning these candidacies into elected offices. While existing research posits important explanatory accounts of both these processes, both stages are often studied separately when the determinants of women’s descriptive representation are analyzed. This generates possible inferential issues, because one stage conditions the other and individual variables might pull in opposing directions in both stages. Drawing on a novel data set of mayoral elections in almost 10,000 municipalities across 15 Latin American countries, we build on existing research to identify the distinct components of glass ceilings at both stages, propose a methodological solution to this problem, illustrate how certain variables have different effects in each stage, and draw implications for theory building in the research on women’s descriptive representation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kouba, K., & Dosek, T. (2023). Understanding the dual glass ceiling of selecting and electing women candidates: evidence from Latin American mayoral elections. Contemporary Politics, 29(3), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2022.2143638

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free