Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants

28Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Pregnant women have unprecedented choices for prenatal screening and testing. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the option to screen for aneuploidy of all chromosomes and genome-wide copy-number variants (CNVs), expanding screening beyond the common trisomies (“traditional” cfDNA). We sought to review the utilization trends and clinical performance characteristics of a commercially available genome-wide cfDNA test, with a subset having available diagnostic testing outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 55,517 samples submitted for genome-wide cfDNA screening at a commercial laboratory, assessing indications, demographics, results, and performance. The cohort was broken into three “testing years”’ to compare trends. Results: Indications shifted over time, with a decrease in referrals for ultrasound findings (22.0% to 12.0%) and an increase in no known high-risk indication (3.0% to 16.6%). Of the positive results, 25% would be missed with traditional cfDNA screening. High sensitivity and specificity were observed with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.6% for genome-wide CNVs and 22.4% for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs). Conclusion: A broader patient population is utilizing genome-wide cfDNA, yet positivity rates and the contribution of genome-wide events have remained stable at approximately 5% and 25%, respectively. Test performance in a real-world clinical population shows high PPVs in those CNVs tested, with diagnostic outcomes in over 40% of positive cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soster, E., Boomer, T., Hicks, S., Caldwell, S., Dyr, B., Chibuk, J., & Almasri, E. (2021). Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants. Genetics in Medicine, 23(7), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01135-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free