Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status

4Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study uses data from the European Social Survey in order to test the Prinstein-Dodge hypothesis that posits that peer effects may be larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. When defining individualism and collectivism at the country level, our results show that peer effects on obesity are indeed larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. However, when defining individualism and collectivism with individual values based on the Shalom Schwartz universal values theory, we find little support for this hypothesis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nie, P., Gwozdz, W., Reisch, L., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2017). Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status. Journal of Obesity, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free