A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research

62Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The standard viewpoint that cancer is a genetic disease is often stated as a fact rather than a theory. By not acknowledging that it is a theory, namely the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), researchers are limiting their progress. An attractive alternative to SMT is the tissue organization field theory (TOFT), which is summarized as "development gone awry." To initiate a kerfuffle, I discuss the interpretation of various results under both TOFT and SMT, including recurrent mutations, hereditary cancers, induction of tumors in transgenic experiments, remission of tumors following the inhibition of enzymes activated by mutated genes, nongenotoxic carcinogens, denervation experiments, foreign-body carcinogenesis, transplantation experiments, and tumors with zero mutations. Thinking in terms of TOFT can spur new lines of research; examples are given related to the early detection of cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, S. G. (2015, February 1). A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju405

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free