Cochlear implantation in children with postlingual hearing loss

19Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Although it is clear that early auditory stimulation through cochlear implantation (CI) has been shown to improve speech and language development trajectories for children with prelingual hearing loss, data supporting implantation in postlingual children are mostly lacking. The purpose of this study was to characterize speech perception abilities following CI in a group of children with previously well-developed language abilities. Study Design: Retrospective analysis. Methods: Twenty-eight hearing-impaired children who received CIs were selected for study based on the presence of well-developed spoken language skills before implantation. Fifteen children with prelingual hearing loss served as a control group. Speech perception skills were assessed using developmentally appropriate measures. Results: Children with postlingual hearing loss showed a statistically significant improvement in open-set speech perception scores as early as 6 months following CI, whereas prelingual children demonstrated significant improvements only after 24 months of use. Despite these early disparities in performance, the two groups were similar 36 months after implantation and beyond (60 months of implant use). Conclusions: Children with well-developed language abilities before CI showed substantial (and statistically significant) early improvements in open-set speech perception abilities following implantation that continued beyond 2 years of follow-up. These results suggest that postlingual children are excellent candidates for CI. Laryngoscope, 2012 © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmad, F. I., Demason, C. E., Teagle, H. F. B., Henderson, L., Adunka, O. F., & Buchman, C. A. (2012). Cochlear implantation in children with postlingual hearing loss. Laryngoscope, 122(8), 1852–1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23362

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free