Accuracy of Practitioner Estimates of Probability of Diagnosis before and after Testing

83Citations
Citations of this article
159Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Accurate diagnosis is essential to proper patient care. Objective: To explore practitioner understanding of diagnostic reasoning. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, 723 practitioners at outpatient clinics in 8 US states were asked to estimate the probability of disease for 4 scenarios common in primary care (pneumonia, cardiac ischemia, breast cancer screening, and urinary tract infection) and the association of positive and negative test results with disease probability from June 1, 2018, to November 26, 2019. Of these practitioners, 585 responded to the survey, and 553 answered all of the questions. An expert panel developed the survey and determined correct responses based on literature review. Results: A total of 553 (290 resident physicians, 202 attending physicians, and 61 nurse practitioners and physician assistants) of 723 practitioners (76.5%) fully completed the survey (median age, 32 years; interquartile range, 29-44 years; 293 female [53.0%]; 296 [53.5%] White). Pretest probability was overestimated in all scenarios. Probabilities of disease after positive results were overestimated as follows: pneumonia after positive radiology results, 95% (evidence range, 46%-65%; comparison P <0.05%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morgan, D. J., Pineles, L., Owczarzak, J., Magder, L., Scherer, L., Brown, J. P., … Korenstein, D. (2021). Accuracy of Practitioner Estimates of Probability of Diagnosis before and after Testing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(6), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free