Allogeneic red blood cell transfusions: Efficacy, risks, alternatives and indications

171Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Careful assessment of risks and benefits has to precede each decision on allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Currently, a number of key issues in transfusion medicine are highly controversial, most importantly the influence of different transfusion thresholds on clinical outcome. The aim of this article is to review current evidence on blood transfusions, to highlight 'hot topics' with respect to efficacy, outcome and risks, and to provide the reader with transfusion guidelines. In addition, a brief synopsis of transfusion alternatives will be given. Based on up-to-date information of current evidence, together with clinical knowledge and experience, the physician will be able to make transfusion decisions that bear the lowest risk for the patient. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madjdpour, C., & Spahn, D. R. (2005). Allogeneic red blood cell transfusions: Efficacy, risks, alternatives and indications. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free