Two-Dye Versus Three-Dye DIGE for Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomic Analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The global analysis of the proteome is an important tool in cell biology. Comparative proteomic evaluations can identify and compare the composition, dynamics, and modifications between different samples. Comparing tissue proteomes under different conditions is crucial for advancing the biomedical field. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) is a sensitive and robust biochemical method that can compare multiple protein samples over a broad dynamic range on the same analytical gel and can be used to establish differentially expressed protein profiles between different sample groups. 2D-DIGE involves fluorescently labeling protein samples with CyDye flours, via a two-dye or a three-dye system, pre-separation by isoelectric point, and molecular weight. DIGE circumvents gel-to-gel variability by multiplexing samples to a single gel and through the use of a pooled internal standard for normalization, thus enabling accurate high-resolution analysis of differences in protein abundance between samples. This chapter discusses 2D-DIGE as a comparative tissue proteomic technique and describes in detail the experimental steps required for comparative proteomic analysis employing both options of two-dye and three-dye DIGE minimal labeling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holland, A. (2023). Two-Dye Versus Three-Dye DIGE for Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomic Analysis. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 2596, pp. 245–263). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2831-7_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free