A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.
CITATION STYLE
Finocchiaro, M. A. (2004). Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument. Informal Logic, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v23i1.2152
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.