Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument

  • Finocchiaro M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finocchiaro, M. A. (2004). Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument. Informal Logic, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v23i1.2152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free