A selective sampling strategy for label ranking

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We propose a novel active learning strategy based on the compression framework of [9] for label ranking functions which, given an input instance, predict a total order over a predefined set of alternatives. Our approach is theoretically motivated by an extension to ranking and active learning of Kääriäinen's generalization bounds using unlabeled data [7], initially developed in the context of classification. The bounds we obtain suggest a selective sampling strategy provided that a sufficiently, yet reasonably large initial labeled dataset is provided. Experiments on Information Retrieval corpora from automatic text summarization and question/answering show that the proposed approach allows to substantially reduce the labeling effort in comparison to random and heuristic-based sampling strategies. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Sample Compression, Learnability, and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Family of Additive Online Algorithms for Category Ranking

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The automatic construction of large-scale corpora for summarization research

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimizing estimated loss reduction for active sampling in rank learning

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Active Sampling for rank learning via Optimizing the area under the ROC Curve

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relevant knowledge helps in choosing right teacher: Active query selection for ranking adaptation

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amini, M., Usunier, N., Laviolette, F., Lacasse, A., & Gallinari, P. (2006). A selective sampling strategy for label ranking. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4212 LNAI, pp. 18–29). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11871842_7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 11

85%

Engineering 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free