Discrepancies in written versus calculated durations in opioid prescriptions: Pre-post study

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The United States is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. Long-term use of opioid medications is associated with an increased risk of dependence. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention makes specific recommendations regarding opioid prescribing, including that prescription quantities should not exceed the intended duration of treatment. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if opioid prescription quantities written at our institution exceed intended duration of treatment and whether enhancements to our electronic health record system improved any discrepancies. Methods: We examined the opioid prescriptions written at our institution for a 22-month period. We examined the duration of treatment documented in the prescription itself and calculated a duration based on the quantity of tablets and doses per day. We determined whether requiring documentation of the prescription duration affected these outcomes. Results: We reviewed 72,314 opioid prescriptions, of which 16.96% had a calculated duration that was greater than what was documented in the prescription. Making the duration a required field significantly reduced this discrepancy (17.95% vs 16.21%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slovis, B. H., Kairys, J., Babula, B., Girondo, M., Martino, C., Roke, L. M., & Riggio, J. (2020). Discrepancies in written versus calculated durations in opioid prescriptions: Pre-post study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/16199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free