Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescent antibody (DIFMA) test using Leishmania genus-specific monoclonal antibody in the routine diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A direct immunofluorescent antibody (DIFMA) test using a Leishmania genus-specific monoclonal antibody was evaluated in the routine diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ecuador. This test was compared with the standard diagnostic techniques of scrapings, culture and histology. Diagnostic samples were taken from a total of 90 active dermal ulcers from patients from areas of Ecuador known to be endemic for cutaneous leishmaniasis. DIFMA was positive in all lesions. It was shown to be significantly superior to standard diagnostic methods either alone or in combination. The sensitivity of DIFMA did not diminish with chronicity of lesions. This test proved to be extremely useful in the routine diagnosis of CL because it is highly sensitive, is easy to use and produces rapid results.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Miltefosine for new world cutaneous leishmaniasis

320Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chico, M. E., Guderian, R. H., Cooper, P. J., Armijos, R., & Grogl, M. (1995). Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescent antibody (DIFMA) test using Leishmania genus-specific monoclonal antibody in the routine diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 28(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86821995000200002

Readers over time

‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0