Age and outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure

141Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The DANISH study (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs [Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators] in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) did not demonstrate an overall effect on all-cause mortality with ICD implantation. However, the prespecified subgroup analysis suggested a possible age-dependent association between ICD implantation and mortality with survival benefit seen only in the youngest patients. The nature of this relationship between age and outcome of a primary prevention ICD in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure warrants further investigation. METHODS: All 1116 patients from the DANISH study were included in this prespecified subgroup analysis. We assessed the relationship between ICD implantation and mortality by age, and an optimal age cutoff was estimated nonparametrically with selection impact curves. Modes of death were divided into sudden cardiac death and nonsudden death and compared between patients younger and older than this age cutoff with the use of χ2 analysis. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 63 years (range, 21-84 years). There was a linearly decreasing relationship between ICD and mortality with age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003-1.06; P=0.03). An optimal age cutoff for ICD implantation was present at ≤70 years. There was an association between reduced all-cause mortality and ICD in patients ≤70 years of age (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P=0.03) but not in patients >70 years of age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.68-1.62; P=0.84). For patients ≤70 years old, the sudden cardiac death rate was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) and nonsudden death rate was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.1-3.5) events per 100 patient-years, whereas for patients >70 years old, the sudden cardiac death rate was 1.6 (95% CI, 0.8-3.2) and nonsudden death rate was 5.4 (95% CI, 3.7-7.8) events per 100 patient-years. This difference in modes of death between the 2 age groups was statistically significant (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with systolic heart failure not caused by ischemic heart disease, the association between the ICD and survival decreased linearly with increasing age. In this study population, an age cutoff for ICD implantation at ≤70 years yielded the highest survival for the population as a whole.

References Powered by Scopus

A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification

41018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction

6063Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure

5787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

7973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death

1456Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

1355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elming, M. B., Nielsen, J. C., Haarbo, J., Videbæk, L., Korup, E., Signorovitch, J., … Thune, J. J. (2017). Age and outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. Circulation, 136(19), 1772–1780. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028829

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

52%

Researcher 18

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 65

86%

Engineering 4

5%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

5%

Sports and Recreations 3

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 18

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0