This paper reviews the epidemiological debate between the relative income hypothesis and the absolute income hypothesis. The dispute between these rival hypotheses has to do with whether an adequate account of the relationship between income and life expectancy requires the definition of 'income' to include any comparative element. I discuss the evidence offered for the relative hypothesis (which answers, 'yes'), as well as two important criticisms that have been levelled against this evidence. I also offer some critical reflections on the debate from a philosophical standpoint concerned with the ethics of population health. Both hypotheses agree that a redistribution of income towards the worst off will improve their life expectancy. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.
CITATION STYLE
Sreenivasan, G. (2009, April). Ethics and epidemiology: The income debate. Public Health Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/php004
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.