Evaluation of dental crowding in mixes dentition comparison between two methods

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assessment of dental crowding in mixed dentition from sixty-two study models, maxillary and mandibular, by two different methods was attempted. A single examiner compared the following methods: Nance that used brass wire for measuring the available space between the mesial surfaces of the first permanent molars and Lündstrom that includes the first permanent molars and used digital calipers. The results showed Lündstrom method to be more reliable, reproducible and less time consuming.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Festila, D., Pacurar, M., Golovcencu, L., Nenovici, D., Zalana, A., Ghergie, M., … Enache, M. (2019). Evaluation of dental crowding in mixes dentition comparison between two methods. Revista de Chimie, 70(5), 1852–1855. https://doi.org/10.37358/rc.19.5.7230

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free