Biosafety Management Risk Analysis for Clinical Departments of Military Central Hospitals in the Fujian Province of China

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To establish biosafety risk-management guidelines for clinical departments of military central hospitals in China. Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), we assessed the biosafety risk priority number (RPN) of clinical departments of three military central hospitals. Nosocomial infection (NI), medical substance-associated accident (MSA), medical technology misuse (MTM), and synthetic RPN were 0.50 to 4.37, 0.50 to 2.91, 0.50 to 3.42, and 0.64 to 3.28, respectively. NI prevention investment was negatively correlated with NI risk, while NI RPN was positively correlated with MSA RPN. There were significant differences between groups of departments in synthetic and MTM RPN. NI, MSA, and MTM constitute a hospital biosafety risk. However, their risk factors are distributed differently among departments. Traditional NI prevention investment can reduce NI risk, but such investments were not effective for MSA and MTM. Targeted measures need to be taken by referring to RPN and risk levels derived from FMEA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., He, M., Lin, X., & Lin, Y. (2022). Biosafety Management Risk Analysis for Clinical Departments of Military Central Hospitals in the Fujian Province of China. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free