The detectability of auditory signals in reproducible random noise was studied under two conditions: a single noise used throughout a block of 288 trials, and 12 noises occurring at random but with equal frequency throughout a block of trials. Both 2-interval forced-choice judgments and judgments of the presence or absence of the signal in single-noise samples were obtained in separate blocks of trials. On individual trials of the forced-choice judgments, the same noise appeared in both intervals. The noises were stored numerically in a PB-250 computer and converted to sound during the experiment by means of a digital-to-analog converter. The signal frequency was 312.5 cps. Signal detectability was found to be significantly better when a single noise was present in a block of trials. Performance was poorer for presence-absence judgments than for forced-choice judgments. The results support the importance of memory from trial to trial in the detection process.
CITATION STYLE
Pfafflin, S. M. (1965). Detection of Auditory Signals in Restricted Sets of Reproducible Noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37(6_Supplement), 1193–1193. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1939483
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.