Spatial patterns and environmental drivers of benthic infaunal community structure and ecosystem function on the New Zealand continental margin

25Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To investigate regional drivers of spatial patterns in macro- and meio-faunal community structure (abundance, biomass and taxonomic diversity) and ecosystem function (sediment community oxygen consumption [SCOC]), we sampled two regions in close proximity on New Zealand's continental margin - the Chatham Rise and the Challenger Plateau. Sites (n = 15) were selected in water depths ranging from 266-1212 m to generate a gradient in sedimentary properties and, in particular, surface pelagic productivity. Both macro- and meio-fauna abundance and biomass was 2-3.5 times higher on the Chatham Rise than on the Challenger Plateau, reflecting regional differences in pelagic primary production. We also found significant inter- and intra-regional differences in macro-fauna taxonomic diversity with two distinctive site groupings in each region. Univariate and multivariate measures of macro-fauna community attributes were most strongly correlated with sediment photosynthetic pigment (explaining 24%-59% of the variation). Sediment pigment content was as equally important in explaining meio-fauna community structure (36%-7%). Unlike community structure, SCOC was most strongly correlated with depth (44%), most likely reflecting temperature effects on benthic metabolism. Our results highlight the importance of a benthic labile food supply in structuring infaunal communities on continental margins and emphasise a tight coupling between pelagic and benthic habitats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pilditch, C. A., Leduc, D., Nodder, S. D., Probert, P. K., & Bowden, D. A. (2015). Spatial patterns and environmental drivers of benthic infaunal community structure and ecosystem function on the New Zealand continental margin. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 49(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2014.995678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free