"Good is up" is not always better: A memory advantage for words in metaphor-incompatible locations

7Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Four experiments examined whether memory for positive and negative words depended on word location and vertical hand movements. Cognitive processing is known to be facilitated when valenced stimuli are presented in locations that are congruent with the GOOD is UP conceptual metaphor, relative to when they are presented in incongruent locations. In both free recall and recognition tasks, we find a memory advantage for words that had been studied in metaphor incongruent locations (positive down, negative up). This incongruity advantage depends on the location of words during encoding, but no evidence was found to suggest that other spatial associations, such as the vertical position of the hand at encoding or word location during retrieval, affect memory. The results indicate that metaphors, like schemas, categories, and stereotypes, can influence cognition in complex ways, producing variable outcomes across different tasks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elizabeth Crawford, L., Cohn, S. M., & Kim, A. B. (2014). “Good is up” is not always better: A memory advantage for words in metaphor-incompatible locations. PLoS ONE, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free