Principle vs. pragmatism: Policy shifts and political competition

185Citations
Citations of this article
202Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article investigates the electoral effect of party policy shifts, I argue that whether party policy shifts are damaging or rewarding depends on whether the shift occurs in the pragmatic or principled issue domain. On pragmatic issues, voters value "getting things done." Policy shifts in this domain signal responsiveness to the changing environment and are likely to be rewarded. Principled issues, however, concern core beliefs and values. Any policy shift in this domain is a sign of inconsistency and lack of credibility, which is likely to lead to voter withdrawal. These arguments are supported by evidence from 23 advanced democracies over a period of 40 years. © 2007, Midwest Political Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tavits, M. (2007). Principle vs. pragmatism: Policy shifts and political competition. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00243.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free