Quantifying vocal mimicry in the greater racket-tailed drongo: A comparison of automated methods and human assessment

8Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective identification and description of mimicked calls is a primary component of any study on avian vocal mimicry but few studies have adopted a quantitative approach. We used spectral feature representations commonly used in human speech analysis in combination with various distance metrics to distinguish between mimicked and non-mimicked calls of the greater racket-tailed drongo, Dicrurus paradiseus and cross-validated the results with human assessment of spectral similarity. We found that the automated method and human subjects performed similarly in terms of the overall number of correct matches of mimicked calls to putative model calls. However, the two methods also misclassified different subsets of calls and we achieved a maximum accuracy of ninety five per cent only when we combined the results of both the methods. This study is the first to use Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients and Relative Spectral Amplitude - filtered Linear Predictive Coding coefficients to quantify vocal mimicry. Our findings also suggest that in spite of several advances in automated methods of song analysis, corresponding cross-validation by humans remains essential. © 2014 Agnihotri et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agnihotri, S., Sundeep, P. V. D. S., Seelamantula, C. S., & Balakrishnan, R. (2014). Quantifying vocal mimicry in the greater racket-tailed drongo: A comparison of automated methods and human assessment. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free