From "identical" to "similar": Fusing retrieved lists based on inter-document similarities

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods for fusing document lists that were retrieved in response to a query often uti- lize the retrieval scores and/or ranks of documents in the lists. We present a novel fusion approach that is based on using, in addition, information induced from inter-document similarities. Specifically, our methods let similar documents from different lists provide relevance-status support to each other. We use a graph-based method to model relevance- status propagation between documents. The propagation is governed by inter-document- similarities and by retrieval scores of documents in the lists. Empirical evaluation demon- strates the effectiveness of our methods in fusing TREC runs. The performance of our most effective methods transcends that of effective fusion methods that utilize only re- trieval scores or ranks. © 2011 AI Access Foundation. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization

2441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries

1995Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rank aggregation methods for the web

1459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cluster-based fusion of retrieved lists

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fusion in information retrieval: SIGIR 2018 half-day tutorial

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The cluster hypothesis in information retrieval

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozorovitsky, A. K., & Kurland, O. (2011). From “identical” to “similar”: Fusing retrieved lists based on inter-document similarities. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 41, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3214

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘2201234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Researcher 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

83%

Arts and Humanities 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0