Elevated “neural noise” has been advanced as an explanation of autism and autistic sensory experiences. However, functional neuroimaging measures of neural noise may be vulnerable to contamination by recording noise. This study explored variability of electrophysiological responses to tones of different intensities in 127 autistic and 79 typically-developing children aged 2–5 years old. A rigorous data processing pipeline, including advanced visualizations of different signal sources that were maximally independent across different time lags, was used to identify and eliminate putative recording noise. Inter-trial variability was measured using median absolute deviations (MADs) of EEG amplitudes across trials and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC). ITPC was elevated in autism in the 50 and 60 dB intensity conditions, suggesting diminished (rather than elevated) neural noise in autism, although reduced ITPC to soft 50 dB sounds was associated with increased loudness discomfort. Autistic and non-autistic participants did not differ in MADs, and indeed, the vast majority of the statistical tests examined in this study yielded no significant effects. These results appear inconsistent with the neural noise account.
CITATION STYLE
Dwyer, P., Vukusic, S., Williams, Z. J., Saron, C. D., & Rivera, S. M. (2024). “Neural Noise” in Auditory Responses in Young Autistic and Neurotypical Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54(2), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05797-4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.