Interface micromotion of cementless hip arthroplasty: Collared vs non-collared stems

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty has been used extensively for treatment of hip joint disorder, with the latter gaining popularity due to conservation of bone mass. Major problem associated with the cementless design is the lack of stability. Several design features were introduced to provide the much needed stability for bone integration. These include fins, fiber mesh, beads, indentations and collars. The use of collar has been a subject of controversy with mixed reports of clinical outcomes. In this study, the effectiveness of collar in terms of providing stability was analysed using finite element method. Three dimensional model of a human femur was constructed from CT dataset and hip arthroplasty was simulated. With an applied joint contact load simulating physiological gait, micromotion of the implant relative to the bone was calculated via an experimentally validated algorithm. Results showed that collar did not improve stability of the whole stem but only around the medial calcar region. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdul Kadir, M. R., Kamsah, N., & Mohlisun, N. (2008). Interface micromotion of cementless hip arthroplasty: Collared vs non-collared stems. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 21 IFMBE, pp. 428–432). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69139-6_109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free