Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: Fallacies and facts

141Citations
Citations of this article
956Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions. In this study, cell and tissue samples were processed according to routine protocols either with or without a blocking step (goat serum or BSA). Surprisingly, no Abs in samples processed without a blocking step showed any propensity for non-specific binding leading to background staining, implying that endogenous FcRs do not retain their ability to bind the Fc portion of Abs after standard fixation. Likewise, we did not find any non-specific Ab binding ascribable to either ionic or hydrophobic interactions. We determined that traditionally used protein blocking steps are unnecessary in the immunostaining of routinely fixed cell and tissue samples.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buchwalow, I., Samoilova, V., Boecker, W., & Tiemann, M. (2011). Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: Fallacies and facts. Scientific Reports, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free