Relevance of the type III error in epidemiological maps

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: A type III error arises from a two-sided test, when one side is erroneously favoured although the true effect actually resides on the other side. The relevance of this grave error in decision-making is studied for epidemiological maps.Results: Theoretical considerations confirm that a type III error may be large for regions with small numbers of expected cases even when no spatial smoothing has been performed. A simulation study based on infant mortality data in Austria reveals that spatial smoothing may additionally increase the risk of type III errors.Conclusions: The occurrence of a type III error should be taken into account when interpreting results presented in epidemiological maps, particularly with regard to sparsely populated regions and spatial smoothing. © 2012 Heinzl and Waldhoer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinzl, H., & Waldhoer, T. (2012). Relevance of the type III error in epidemiological maps. International Journal of Health Geographics, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-11-34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free