Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia in 24401 patients with venous thromboembolism: Findings from the RIETE Registry

Abstract

Background: Whether the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) confers a higher risk of thrombocytopenia than does treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remains controversial, and very few data are available from routine clinical practice. Objectives: We assessed the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (HAT) according to the type of heparin therapy, UFH or LMWH. Patients/Methods: Data were obtained from the international prospective Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE), which included 25369 patients with confirmed VTE until February 2009. Among them, 24401 patients were treated either with UFH or with LMWH, and had available information about the 6-month occurrence of confirmed thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count ≤150000mm -3. Results: One hundred and forty-one patients receiving UFH and/or LMWH developed thrombocytopenia within a 6-month period. The incidence of HAT was significantly higher in the UFH group (1.36%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.17) than in the LMWH group (0.54%, 95% CI 0.44-0.64). As compared with LMWH, UFH significantly increased the risk of HAT in female patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 4.90%, 95% CI 2.58-9.31, P=0.001) but not in male patients (adjusted HR 1.60%, 95% CI 0.64-3.97, P=0.31); P=0.027 for comparison. In each gender, the UFH-associated excess risk was confined to patients with VTE unrelated to cancer. The poor prognosis of patients with thrombocytopenia was not influenced by the type of heparin therapy. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, treatment of VTE with UFH seems to confer a higher risk of thrombocytopenia than does treatment with LMWH, especially in women and non-cancerous patients. © 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.