Literature, emotions, and the possible: Hazlitt and stendhal

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Successful literature offers either directly or indirectly rich descriptions of actions and emotions of human beings. I will first examine in this chapter what can be called the general theory of emotions in Hazlitt and Stendhal. Their approach to affectivity stood in opposition to the most common Romantic sentimentalism at the beginning of the nineteenth century: They believed, in fact, that the heart and the reason were not enemies but on the contrary deeply interconnected. Both writers were convinced that most human activities are motivated by emotions but were utterly suspicious of condescending sentimental attitudes, and condemned Rousseau’s complacency in his own feelings. I will then focus on a specific faculty of the mind as understood by Hazlitt in his essays, and by Stendhal in his various writings and his novels: The imagination has the capability of combining the real and the possible, and therefore analyzing by conjecture and thought experiments both the past and the future:.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lombardo, P. (2014). Literature, emotions, and the possible: Hazlitt and stendhal. In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan - Volume 2 (pp. 117–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free