State-Making and the Suspension of Law in India’s Northeast: The Place of Exception in the Assam-Nagaland Border Dispute

  • Suykens B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Post 9/11, exceptionalism has won popularity to describe the variety of processes resulting from a new security discourse, the war on terror and the treatment of terrorism suspects.1 Indeed, the central case to argue and counterargue the usefulness of the concept of the state of exception is the “modern camp” in Guantanamo Bay.2 Other key cases include the analysis of (illegal) migrants3 and, interrelated, of the securization of border regimes,4 where the discussion on the inside and the outside of the state and the sovereign power seems to be most profound. Little attention has however been awarded to exceptionalism away from this security and terrorism discourse. Moreover, cases are often only used to make a theoretical argument about the state of exception, and the attention to a particular case seems to be little more than a corollary of a theoretical positioning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suykens, B. (2013). State-Making and the Suspension of Law in India’s Northeast: The Place of Exception in the Assam-Nagaland Border Dispute. In Violence on the Margins (pp. 167–189). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333995_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free