A Comparison of Registration Methods for SLAM with the M8 Quanergy LiDAR

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

LiDAR based SLAM is becoming affordable by new sensors such as the M8 Quanergy LiDAR, but there is still little work reporting on the accuracy attained with them. In this paper we report on the comparison of three registration methods applied to the estimation of the path followed by the LiDAR sensor and the registration of the overall cloud of points, namely the iterated closest points (ICP), Coherent Point Drift (CPD), and Normal Distributions Transform (NDT) registration methods. In our experiment, we found that the NDT method provides the most robust performance.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aguilar-Moreno, M., & Graña, M. (2021). A Comparison of Registration Methods for SLAM with the M8 Quanergy LiDAR. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1268 AISC, pp. 824–834). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57802-2_79

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free