Trust, cooperation, and conflict: Neuropolitics and international relations

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Neuroeconomics or the study of brain activity illuminates how choices are made. Kugler and Zak show how oxytocin impacts brain chemistry and levels of trust, with possible implications for decision-making, and, in turn, conflict and cooperation. They offer a challenge to realist theory by questioning its assumptions about a fully Hobbesian world and by incorporating the notion of trust into our thinking and modeling as well. We are misled by the over-emphasis on anarchy at the systemic level to the neglect of sub-systemic variables such as trust and the neuroscience aspects that help shape it. Kugler and Zak argue that willingness to accept international rules that restrict behavior and help avoid conflict depends critically on the level of trust. While they recognize that numerous variables influence cooperation, and that realists certainly do hold out the prospect for cooperation even if that is difficult to achieve, they believe that our understanding of trust is under-developed as is the role of neuroscience in influencing our decisions. Their chapter combines the path-breaking work of Paul Zak in the laboratory with Kugler’s enormous record in international relations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kugler, J., & Zak, P. J. (2016). Trust, cooperation, and conflict: Neuropolitics and international relations. In Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations (pp. 83–114). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40823-1_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free