Jurisdictional and procedural technicalities in hate speech cases: South African human rights commission v khumalo 2019 1 sa 289 (gj)

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The jurisdiction or competence of the Equality Court to hear a dispute concerning alleged hate speech is affected by various jurisdictional factors. The decision in South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo 2019 1 All SA 254 (GJ) reveals several shortcomings in the provisions regulating jurisdiction in the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 which must be attended to in order to provide clarity and legitimacy in regard to the application of the protection against hate speech.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geldenhuys, J., & Kelly-Louw, M. (2020). Jurisdictional and procedural technicalities in hate speech cases: South African human rights commission v khumalo 2019 1 sa 289 (gj). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 23, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/V23I0A7145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free