Stakeholder’s experiences, expectations and decision making on reproductive care: An ethnographic study of three districts in northern Ghana

2Citations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In Ghana, priority-setting for reproductive health service interventions is known to be rudimentary with little wider stakeholder involvement. In recognizing the need for broad stakeholder engagement to advance reproductive care provision and utilization, it is necessary to jointly study the varied stakeholder views on reproductive care services. Methods: We applied an ethnographic study approach where field data was collected between March-May 2015 in three rural districts of northern Ghana. Data was collected among women with recent births experiences (n = 90), health care providers (n = 16) and policy actors (n = 6). In-depth interviews and focus group discussions was applied to collect all data. Each stakeholder participant’s audio file was transcribed, and repeatedly read through to identify similar and divergent views in data. A coding scheme guided coding processes. All transcripts were then imported into QSR NVivo 11 for further analysis. Results: Four themes emerged. Women participants accentuated that sex and sexuality values of men have changed over time, and drives gender roles, parity levels and decision making on reproductive care needs at community levels. Sexual stigma on reproductive care reduces the willingness of women to voice poor experiences related to their previous reproductive experiences. All stakeholders’ highlighted clinical treatments for post-abortion care are minimally covered under the fee exemption policy for antenatal and postnatal care. Policy processes on service delivery protocols still is top-down in Ghana. Conclusions: Health teams working to improve sexual and reproductive health care must find suitable context strategies that effectively work to improve women reproductive care needs at their operational levels. Private sector participation and informal community support clutches are encouraged to advance the delivery of reproductive care services.

Figures

  • Table 1. Sample structure of questions used to assess all stakeholder groups.
  • Table 2. Women views on gender role impacts on attaining their reproductive care needs.
  • Table 3. Stakeholder experience with service provision to meet user reproductive preferences.
  • Table 4. Stakeholder expectations on provision and meeting women reproductive care preferences.
  • Table 5. Policy setting and decision making expressions in meeting women reproductive preferences.

References Powered by Scopus

Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: A call to action

572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: An examination of the evidence

429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Men's influences on women's reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

"our girls need to see a path to the future" - Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health information among adolescent girls, guardians, and initiation counselors in Mulanje district, Malawi

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Involving men in pregnancy: a cross-sectional analysis of the role of self-efficacy, gender-equitable attitudes, relationship dynamics and knowledge among men in Kinshasa

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayanore, M. A., Pavlova, M., Biesma, R., & Groot, W. (2017). Stakeholder’s experiences, expectations and decision making on reproductive care: An ethnographic study of three districts in northern Ghana. PLoS ONE, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186908

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 48

59%

Researcher 22

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 29

39%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0