Automatic Text Simplification for Social Good: Progress and Challenges

50Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, automatic text simplification (ATS) was promoted as a natural language processing (NLP) task with great potential to make texts more accessible to people with various reading or cognitive disabilities, and enable their better social inclusion. Large multidisciplinary projects showed promising steps in that direction. Since 2010, the field started attracting more attention but at the cost of major shifts in system architecture, target audience, and evaluation strategies. Somewhere along the way, the focus has shifted from ATS for social good towards building complex end-to-end neural architectures that are not aimed at any particular target population. This study presents the trajectory of ATS for social good, the main issues in current ATS trends, and the ways forward that could bring the field back to its initial goals.

References Powered by Scopus

Creating training corpora for NLG micro-planning

398Citations
187Readers

Exploring neural text simplification models

198Citations
175Readers

A survey of research on text simplification

172Citations
146Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Revisiting non-English Text Simplification: A Unified Multilingual Benchmark

23Citations
23Readers
22Citations
26Readers
Get full text

Text Simplification for Legal Domain: Insights and Challenges

16Citations
23Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Štajner, S. (2021). Automatic Text Simplification for Social Good: Progress and Challenges. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 (pp. 2637–2652). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.233

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

65%

Researcher 5

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 26

74%

Linguistics 5

14%

Neuroscience 2

6%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0