Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective - A postal survey

57Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barriers whereas the perspective of recruiting physicians has received less attention. Therefore, our aim was to conduct a postal survey among recruiting physicians of a multi-center trial to weigh barriers according to their impact on recruitment. Methods. We identified any potential recruitment barriers from the literature and from our own experience with a multi-center trial of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered questionnaire where recruiting physicians were asked to express their agreement with statements about recruitment barriers on a Likert-type scale from 1 (full agreement with statement = very substantial recruitment barrier) to 7 (no agreement with statement = no recruitment barrier). Results. 38 of 55 recruiting physicians returned questionnaires (69% response rate), of which 35 could be analyzed (64% useable response rate). Recruiting physicians reported that "time constraints" (median agreement of 3, interquartile range 2-5) had the most negative impact on recruitment followed by "difficulties including identified eligible patients" (median agreement of 5, IQR 3-6). Other barriers such as "trial design barriers", "lack of access to treatment", "individual barriers of recruiting physicians" or "insufficient training of recruiting physicians" were perceived to have little or no impact on patient recruitment. Conclusion. Physicians perceived time constraints as the most relevant recruitment barrier in a randomized trial. To overcome recruitment barriers interventions, that are affordable for both industry- and investigator-driven trials, need to be developed and tested in randomized trials. Trial registration. ISRCTN84612310.

References Powered by Scopus

Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review

753Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors

426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: Literature summary and annotated bibliography

352Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Designing therapeutic clinical trials for older and frail adults with cancer: U13 conference recommendations

270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - A systematic review

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spaar, A., Frey, M., Turk, A., Karrer, W., & Puhan, M. A. (2009). Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians’ perspective - A postal survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-14

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

47%

Researcher 12

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

15%

Psychology 6

13%

Social Sciences 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free