Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. Aim To explore GP perspectives about ICC. Design and setting Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. Method Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South–Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. Results Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman’s presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. Conclusion Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

James, S., Watson, C., Bernard, E., Rathnasekara, G. K., & Mazza, D. (2023). Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 73. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free