Measure What Matters: A Dual Outcome Service Quality Model for Government Service Delivery

1Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Measuring customer service quality evaluations has been important since the rise of the service industry and many models in this area have been published. Most models focus on one outcome with a set of predictors. These outcomes are often ill defined and concepts are used interchangeably causing issues in creating good and consistent measures of quality. In this study we develop a new model combining multiple outcome variables and a series of predictors to show the interdependent nature of service outcomes. We test the model using machine learning based on survey responses from 3702 Dutch people. The results indicate that two types of outcome variables are important; quality of the outcome and satisfaction with the process. Each is predicted in different ways by four dimensions. This means governments could benefit from a better specification of the desired outcomes of service delivery and targeted measurement approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pieterson, W., & Weng, C. (2020). Measure What Matters: A Dual Outcome Service Quality Model for Government Service Delivery. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12219 LNCS, pp. 138–150). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free