Prevalence effects in X-ray screening tasks with a static or dynamic visual display: Is there any difference?

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Visual search researches have demonstrated target prevalence affected the search performance. However, almost all studies were conducted in static searches. The aim of present study is, using more ecologically valid dynamic visual search, to examine whether different static and dynamic displays affect prevalence effects in screening tasks. Three display patterns were deployed by manipulating the display movement velocity. The results showed that the low prevalence effect existed both in static search and more ecologically valid dynamic visual search. The disciplines of prevalence effects partially applied in dynamic visual search.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., & Sun, X. (2015). Prevalence effects in X-ray screening tasks with a static or dynamic visual display: Is there any difference? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9174, pp. 77–83). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free