The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]: A serious mistake in the references of this article has been discovered; we have overlooked to make a couple of references that rightly should be included: Elin Olsson's MSc thesis [2] and Sofia Hallerbäck's BSc thesis [3]. Olsson and Hallerbäck conducted the fieldwork including slug testing and borehole logging. Olsson did a first evaluation of the logging results, and Hallerbäck evaluated the slug tests. Furthermore, figures from Hallerbäck's BSc thesis work were included. The authors would like to apologize to Hallerbäck and Olsson for failing to include references to their thesis works. References 2 and 3 have been added and cited as references 18 and 22 in the new version. Furthermore, some sentences have been rephrased to improve clarity. For example, the text in connection to Table 1, where the resistivity interval for the layer where groundwater is normally found is now specified, instead of as was the case before the intervals where it is not found. In addition, Figure 7 was replotted to make it clearer. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage, with a reference to this Erratum.
CITATION STYLE
Chirindja, F., Rosberg, J. E., & Dahlin, T. (2017). Erratum: Borehole logging and slug tests for evaluating the applicability of electrical resistivity tomography for groundwater exploration in Nampula complex, Mozambique. [Water (2017), 9, 95] DOI: 10.3390/w9020095. Water (Switzerland). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060435
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.