Sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual modalities: Behavioral and neural differences

45Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has long been known that the auditory system is better suited to guide temporally precise behaviors like sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) than the visual system. Although this phenomenon has been studied for many years, the underlying neural and computational mechanisms remain unclear. Growing consensus suggests the existence of multiple, interacting, context-dependent systems, and that reduced precision in visuomotor timing might be due to the way experimental tasks have been conceived. Indeed, the appropriateness of the stimulus for a given task greatly influences timing performance. In this review, we examine timing differences for sensorimotor synchronization and error correction with auditory and visual sequences, to inspect the underlying neural mechanisms that contribute to modality differences in timing. The disparity between auditory and visual timing likely relates to differences in the processing specialization between auditory and visual modalities (temporal vs. spatial). We propose this difference could offer potential explanation for the differing temporal abilities between modalities. We also offer suggestions as to how these sensory systems interface with motor and timing systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Comstock, D. C., Hove, M. J., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2018, July 18). Sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual modalities: Behavioral and neural differences. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free