Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?

2Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the critical alarms predictors of clinical deterioration/sepsis for clinical decision making in patients admitted to a reference hospital complex. Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study. The Machine Learning (ML) tool, Robot Laura®, scores changes in vital parameters and lab tests, classifying them by severity. Inpatients and patients over 18 years of age were included. Results: A total of 122,703 alarms were extracted from the platform, classified as 2 to 9. The pre-selection of critical alarms (6 to 9) indicated 263 urgent alerts (0.2%), from which, after filtering exclusion criteria, 254 alerts were delimited for 61 inpatients. Patient mortality from sepsis was 75%, of which 52% was due to sepsis related to the new coronavirus. After the alarms were answered, 82% of the patients remained in the sectors. Conclusions: Far beyond technology, ML models can speed up assertive clinical decisions by nurses, optimizing time and specialized human resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scherer, J. de S., Pereira, J. S., Debastiani, M. S., & Bica, C. G. (2022). Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis? Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 75(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free