Who makes decisions for incapacitated patients who have no surrogate or advance directive?

26Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Unrepresented patients are those who have no surrogate or advance directive to guide medical decision making for them when they become incapacitated. While there is no perfect solution to the problem of making medical decisions for such vulnerable patients, 3 different approaches are noted in the literature: a physician approach, an ethics committee approach, and a guardianship approach. Recent policies and laws have required an approach that is “tiered” with respect to both who is involved and the gravity of the medical treatment questions at issue. In a general sense, some variant of a tiered approach is likely the best possible solution for jurisdictions and health institutions—both those already with and those without a tiered approach—to the challenging puzzle of treating unrepresented patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schweikart, S. J. (2019). Who makes decisions for incapacitated patients who have no surrogate or advance directive? AMA Journal of Ethics, 21(7), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free