Three-round public-coin bounded-auxiliary-input zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper investigates the exact round complexity of publiccoin (bounded-auxiliary-input) zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge (ZKAOK). It is well-known that Barak’s non-black-box ZK [FOCS 01], which can be adapted to a ZKAOK, is the first one achieving constantround, public-coin and strict-polynomial-time simulation properties, and admitting a 6-round implementation shown by Ostrovsky and Visconti [ECCC 12]. This achieves the best exact round complexity for publiccoin ZKAOK ever known, to the best of our knowledge. As for a specific case of bounded-auxiliary-input verifiers, i.e. the auxiliary inputs are of bounded-size, no previous works explicitly considered to improve the general result on the exact round number of public-coin ZKAOK in this case. It is also noticeable that when ignoring the argument of knowledge property, Barak et al. [JCSS 06] showed based on two-round public-coin universal arguments which admit a candidate construction of the tworound variant of Micali’s CS-proof, there exists a two-round public-coin plain/bounded-auxiliary-input ZK argument. So an interesting question in ZKAOK is how to improve the exact round complexity of public-coin ZKAOK in both the general and the above specific cases. This paper provides an improvement for the specific case. That is, we show that also based on two-round public-coin universal arguments, there exists a 3-round public-coin bounded-auxiliary-input ZKAOK for NP which admits a strict-polynomial-time non-black-box simulator and an expected-polynomial-time extractor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, N. (2015). Three-round public-coin bounded-auxiliary-input zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8957, pp. 130–149). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16745-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free