Institutional logics and diverging organizational forms: An empirical study in Russia

2Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using an institutional logics approach, this study investigates how the institutional logics of leaders of grassroots social service nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Russia changed over time and how these changes related to changes in organizational mission, people served, professionalization, and interactions with the government. Relying on interviews as well as other data gathered, this analysis of organizational leaders' narratives reveals the identities and experiences that these leaders turn to in their sensemaking of significant events. The findings show that, on the one hand, social welfare NGOs continued to provide services, increased their advocacy efforts, and professionalized their staff. Volunteer organizations, on the other hand, discontinued provision of social services turning instead to the recruitment and development of volunteers. Theoretically, this empirical case illustrates how an interplay of factors at multiple levels can affect the expression of logics at the organizational level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wathen, M. V. (2020). Institutional logics and diverging organizational forms: An empirical study in Russia. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.20899/JPNA.6.2.159-181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free