Responsiveness differences in outcome instruments after revision hip arthroplasty: What are the implications?

1Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Responsiveness to change is an important psychometric property of an outcome instrument. Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is critical to outcome assessment after total joint replacement, a surgery aimed at improving pain, function and HRQoL of the patients undergoing these procedures. In a recent study, Shi et al. examined the responsiveness to change of various subscales of two instruments, physician-administered Harris Hip Score and patient self-administered Short Form-36 (SF-36), 6 months after revision total hip arthroplasty. The responsiveness statistics for both scales were reasonable, higher for Harris Hip Score than SF-36. This is the first study to examine responsiveness of these instruments in revision THA patients in a systematic fashion. © 2011 Singh; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, J. A. (2011). Responsiveness differences in outcome instruments after revision hip arthroplasty: What are the implications? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free