The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: Refining Maslen et al.'s model

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our (2014) model for the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices (CEDs) received a great deal of interest from those involved in European device regulation and from academic commentators. Further, since the publication of our recommendations, the number of manufacturers of brain stimulation devices for non-medical purposes has increased, underscoring the need for a regulatory response. In this paper, we clarify aspects of our original proposal and address additional regulatory issues beyond our original focus on the sale of devices. We begin with theoretical points pertaining to the definition of a CED and the distinction between treatment and enhancement. We then respond to practical challenges raised by the prospect of implementing our regulatory framework. Next, we address some wider societal considerations relating to users and other stakeholders. Finally, we revisit the broader regulatory context within which the various discussions are situated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maslen, H., Douglas, T., Kadosh, R. C., Levy, N., & Savulescu, J. (2016). The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: Refining Maslen et al.’s model. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free