Symposium on soft and hard law on business and human rights. Hard and soft law preferences in business and human rights

10Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

States and non-state actors, such as business organizations and NGOs, have varying preferences among regulatory options in business and human rights. Some actors prefer soft law governance while others advocate for legally binding solutions at the national and international levels. In this essay, I explore some of the factors that may explain why state and non-state actors hold these diverse preferences. I conclude that while some of these preferences may be attributable to the unique advantages of soft law or hard law, other preferences likely depend on the effects produced by the interaction of both types of law within the broader regulatory landscape.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parella, K. (2020). Symposium on soft and hard law on business and human rights. Hard and soft law preferences in business and human rights. In AJIL Unbound (Vol. 114, pp. 168–173). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.33

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free