Differential mobilities and institutionalised illegalities: Trends and contradictions of contemporary labour

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article analyses the new rearrangements and trends of capital and labour regarding the new forms of organising the capital and labour as well the mobilities and control of both, which emerged from the political, economic, social and cultural changes of the last four decades. We argue that by highlighting the contemporary trends and contradictions of capital and labour, focusing on deregulatory disposition on one hand and on regulatory disposition on the other, we can see the formation of processes of differential mobilities (and inclusions) as well a growing situation of precariousness in the contemporary social life. This article is based, empirically, on a range of studies developed at the Laboratory of Work, Professions and Mobility, at the Federal University of São Carlos, which include researches conducted on workers in Brazil as well as on Brazilian immigrants in London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, J. C., & Junior, A. M. (2018). Differential mobilities and institutionalised illegalities: Trends and contradictions of contemporary labour. Tempo Social, 30(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.138076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free