Lack of evidence for direct corticospinal contributions to control of the ipsilateral forelimb in monkey

89Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

500μA, single stimulus) of the majority of corticospinal axons at the medullary pyramids revealed only weak suppressions in ipsilateral muscles at longer latencies than the robust facilitations seen contralaterally. Spike-triggered averaging of ipsilateral muscle activity from M1 neural discharge (184 cells) did not reveal any postspike effects consistent with monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal connections. We also examined the activity of 191 M1 neurons during ipsilateral or contralateral "reach to precision grip" movements. Many cells (67%) modulated their activity during ipsilateral limb movement trials (compared with 90% with contralateral trials), but the timing of this activity was best correlated with weak muscle activity in the contralateral nonmoving arm. We conclude that, in normal adults, any inputs to forelimb motoneurons from the ipsilateral corticospinal tract are weak and indirect and that modulation ofM1cell firing seems to be related primarily to control of the contralateral limb. © 2011 the authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soteropoulos, D. S., Edgley, S. A., & Baker, S. N. (2011). Lack of evidence for direct corticospinal contributions to control of the ipsilateral forelimb in monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(31), 11208–11219. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0257-11.2011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free