A ladder-truss of citizen participation: Re-imagining Arnstein's ladder to bridge between the community and sustainable urban design outcomes

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are well understood urban design approaches that respond to the economic, social, and environmental pillars of sustainable development, but urban design decision-making for sustainable outcomes is complex both technically and, in democratic societies, politically. Urban design decision-making must incorporate citizen participatory processes that, as Sherry Arnstein in her 1969 paper, 'A ladder of citizen participation' points out, are undertaken at varying levels ranging from the tokenistic through to citizen control. In this paper, we explore benefits and challenges of citizen participatory processes illustrated with practical examples from an Australian context and propose improvements that utilise emerging technology. We then outline a new approach that rotates Arnstein's ladder diagram 90° to instead form a ladder-truss of citizen participation. This ladder-truss includes aspects of each rung as a structurally necessary and interwoven component of inclusive participation aimed at bridging between the community and sustainable urban design outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, M., & Langenheim, N. (2021). A ladder-truss of citizen participation: Re-imagining Arnstein’s ladder to bridge between the community and sustainable urban design outcomes. Journal of Design Research, 19(1–3), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2021.121067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free